![]() And you can use the DXO setting to show jpeg. So if you like to see the “original” you need to shoot high quality SOOC-jpeg+raw. Only way to that is using a raw capable viewer or the real SOOC-jpeg, need to shoot jpeg plus raw. Great for windows to preview the raw in explorer but no good for actual judging the image closely. (take a blacknwhite in camera style choosen and windows would show a B&W image on the rawpreview hence the thumbnail version of the sooc-jpeg. If you shoot raw only the embedded file is a SOOC-jpeg style on low resolution. To use just the embedded file as reference to compare what I edited to what original was! With PhotoLab, if you want to use a jpeg file as the source for a comparison, then you need to open a jpeg file for editing but, if you open a RAW file for editing, then it will be the RAW file that will be compared. If you really want to see the embedded jpeg version of a RAW file, you’re usually going to need to use the camera manufacturers own RAW software. So, your assertion that “no other RAW converter uses just the RAW file as reference” is not true. The “before” provided by ACR is going to be the original, untreated RAW image, not the embedded jpeg. Photoshop doesn’t provide a compare feature but ACR does. The original RAW file is never edited, with Photoshop it is always transformed by ACR to a file format that can be edited. If you are using Photoshop, after you have “opened” the RAW file using Adobe Camera Raw, you do not have access to the original RAW in Photoshop, since that was “converted”, usually to TIFF or PSD, but could be jpeg. I do not want to go out of DXO to see original. I know that I can look at the file with normal windows even but if I click on ‘compare button’ on P元 I want to use just the embedded file as reference to compare what I edited to what original was! ![]() I just say nobody (and no other RAW converter) uses just the RAW file as reference. It seems that you do not want to understand. The request for faster view in library is a old request and now the library is getting to be a DAM it is even more a priority to gain some viewing speed. (much less waiting for the ““pop” i am ready to show”) ![]() Then i open PL and start processing wile do a final choose or not. Other people are using FRV instead and have no soocs. Then separate the Rawfiles (easy every rawfile with no twin soocjpeg is waste) i want to load in to PL and tagg them with xnviewmp for a xmp file. (soocs are fine for examination and if your not have 1000 /month images not very much work to delete when used.) I do the first culling outside PL with Faststone Image Viewer by using the SOOC-jpegs as reference. Then you don’t need the embedded jpeg for preview. I think most pain would be gone if a culling in the filmstrip inside the library is only a preview non corrected so no “pop” delay and when hit “fullscreen” the opticalcorrection is getting active for closer look. So a “turn optical correction of” just view raw would speedup the task. I think the slowness of the “pop” due the working of the optical correction makes the culling inside PL a sluggisch methode. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |